|
What is Peer Review?
The process by which original articles and grants written by
researchers are evaluated for technical and scientific quality
and correctness by one or more experts in the same field.
How the Peer Review Process Works?
CRSD’s every journal application
process has its own protocols. This typically works something
like this:
When a group of scientists completes a study and writes it up,
hey prepare it in the form of article and submit it to the
Editor of a journal for the publication.
Ø
The journal’s editor send the submitted article for reviews
to some of the expertise who work in the same field, so can
filter out the poor quality papers, to avoid cluttering the peer
review process with substandard the research.
Ø
Peers (reviewers) provide feedback on the article.
Ø
Peers tell the editor whether or not they think the study is of
high enough quality to be published.
Ø
The remaining papers are sent to referees for further approval,
usually to two leading experts in the field.
Ø
Generally speaking, the editor’s word is final, and the referees
are there on a purely consultation basis.
Ø
The authors may then revise their article and resubmit for the
further consideration.
Editor accepted those articles that meet good scientific
standards. If an article does not maintain sufficiently the high
standards, it may be rejected at that point.
Peer reviewed articles provide a trusted form of research
communication.
Types of Peer Review Process:
The three most
common types of peer review are:
Ø
Single Blind Peer Review
Ø
Double Blind Peer Review
Ø
Open Peer Review
However, other
models have evolved which include key variations from the
standard approach. These include:
Ø
Transferable Peer Review
Ø
Collaborative Peer Review
Ø
Post Publication Peer Review
Single Blind
Peer Review:
In this type of
peer review the author does not know who the reviewers are.
Means that the identity of the
reviewer is anonymous, but the author’s name and affiliation are
on the paper. Like the other forms of reviewing, there are
advantages and disadvantages to single-blind.
Double Blind
Peer Review:
This is the
most common form of peer review. To facilitate this, the authors
need to ensure that their manuscripts are prepared in a way that
does not give away their identity. In this policy of peer review
the reviewers of the paper won’t get know identity of author(s),
and the author(s) won’t get to know the identity of the
reviewer.
Open Peer
Review:
The identities
of both author and reviewer are disclosed to each other at any
point during the publication process. There is a growing
minority of journals using this form of peer review but
popularity among reviewers is yet to be proven.
Transferable
Peer Review:
This is a
fairly new form of peer review which allows subject-related
journals to transfer reviewed manuscripts between each other.
Typically, an author submits their paper to a journal but after
it has been reviewed the editors decide that although not
suitable for their journal it is likely to be appropriate for a
similar journal. The author is then given an option to transfer
the manuscript to the other journal. It's important to note that
transferring a manuscript does not guarantee acceptance in the
other journal. If the author agrees to the transfer, all
manuscript files, metadata and reviewer report forms are sent to
the receiving journal.
Collaborative Peer Review:
This covers a
broad variety of approaches in which a team of people work
together to undertake the review. One format is to have two or
more reviewers work together to review the paper, discuss their
opinions and submit a unified report. Another approach is to
have one or more reviewers collaborate with the author to
improve the paper, until it reaches a publishable standard.
Post
Publication Peer Review:
With this type
of peer review, the option for appraisal and revision of a paper
continues - or occurs - after publication. This may take the
form of a comments page or discussion forum alongside the
published paper. Crucially, post publication peer review does
not exclude other forms of peer review and is usually in
addition to, rather than instead of, pre-publication review.
Becoming a Reviewer:
Getting
involved in the peer review process can be a highly rewarding
experience that can also improve your own research and help to
further your career.
If you’re just
starting out as a reviewer, don’t be deterred. Journal editors
are often looking to expand their pool of reviewers, which means
there will be a demand for your particular area of expertise.
There is no one way to become a reviewer, but there are some
common routes. These include:
Ø
Asking a colleague who already reviews for a journal to
recommend you
Ø
Networking with editors at professional conferences
Ø
Becoming a member of a learned society and then networking with
other members in your area
Ø
Contacting journals directly to inquire if they are seeking new
reviewers
Ø
Seeking mentorship from senior colleagues
Ø
Working for senior researchers who may then delegate peer review
duties to you
You could also try finding a journal with a mentoring program
for early career researchers looking to become reviewers.
Who Can Become a Reviewer?
In short, qualified, capable and enthusiastic people those are
willing to review papers and they wish to handle a paper.
Editors might ask you to look at a specific aspect of an
article, even if the overall topic is outside of your specialist
knowledge. They should outline in their invitation to review
just what it is they would like you to assess.
What is Plagiarism and Plagiarism Checker?
(Link: https://smallseotools.com/plagiarism-checker/)
Technology has been both a miracle and a curse in terms of
plagiarism. No doubt, it has become easier to find the required
information and copy it. Since people often do that without
attribution, it has also become easier to identify and deal with
plagiarism.
Plagiarism definition is actually straightforward. When an
author uses someone else’s work without crediting them, it is
seen as stealing their intellectual property. Just like theft,
the penalties for plagiarized work are also severe all over the
world. The real problem is that most people are not even aware
of what they are doing.
With the plagiarism detector
(Link: https://smallseotools.com/plagiarism-checker/),
it strives to spread awareness of plagiarism while letting
people know how they can prevent it. An author can find
countless real-life examples of plagiarism to help you identify
it in future.
Why is Plagiarism Checker Important?
(Link: https://smallseotools.com/plagiarism-checker/)
Duplicated content results in a lower page rank. If an author
publishes an article or web page content that is not entirely
unique and original, there is a significantly higher risk of
being blacklisted by Google and other search engines. So, if an
author goal is to have a higher page rank- and search engine
results placement (SERP)- then it’s simply not worth the risk of
publishing heavily duplicated content.
While this free plagiarism checker may be used for checking
rewritten or spun content to eliminate consistencies (and raise
the unique value of each article) its benefits aren’t restricted
to black and gray hat SEO techniques. In fact, white hat SEO
specialists rely on this free plagiarism checker to make darn
sure their freelance writers are submitting work that is 100%
original and unique.
The given free plagiarism software checks sentence one by one on
various search engines comparing it with already indexed
content. Moreover, the plagiarism detector does not save any
content in database. You may sign up for free with this online
software
(https://smallseotools.com/plagiarism-checker/),
and we will update you with our latest developments and
improvements in the tools through our newsletter.
Other Free Plagiarism Software:
Ø
https://plagiarismsoftware.org/
Ø
https://www.plagiarismsoftware.net/
Ø
https://www.plagscan.com/plagiarism-check/
Ø
https://www.duplichecker.com/
Ø
https://edubirdie.com/plagiarism-checker
Ø
http://plagiarisma.net/
Ø
https://www.prepostseo.com/plagiarism-checker
Ø
https://plagiarism-checker-x.en.softonic.com/
Ø
https://plagiarism-checker-x.en.softonic.com/
Confidentiality (Do not disclose to others):
Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as
confidential documents. They must not be shared or discussed
with others unless otherwise authorized by the Editor.
Unpublished information or material disclosed in a submitted
manuscript must not be used in a reviewer’s own research without
the express written consent of the author. Privileged
information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept
confidential and not used for personal gain.
Consultation with a single colleague may sometimes be
appropriate but you should always discuss this with the Editor
beforehand. Most Editors welcome additional comments but whoever
else is involved is also obliged to keep the review process
confidential. If the review is referred to a student, he or she
should communicate directly with the Editor.
Double Blind Peer Review Process:
Fig.
|
